Let's Connect
Follow Us
Watch Us
(+385) 1 2380 262
journal.prometfpz.unizg.hr
Promet - Traffic&Transportation journal

Accelerating Discoveries in Traffic Science

Accelerating Discoveries in Traffic Science

PUBLISHED
30.09.2022
LICENSE
Copyright (c) 2024 Branka Trček, Rok Kamnik

How the Volume of Traffic Affected Air Quality During the Extreme Event of COVID-19 Lockdown in a Small City

Authors:Branka Trček, Rok Kamnik

Abstract

The extreme traffic measures during the COVID-19 lockdown provided a unique opportunity to gain better insight into the relationship between traffic characteristics and NO2 concentrations in Maribor, a small Slovenian city. NO2, traffic and meteorological data were statistically processed in detail for March and April 2018, 2019 and 2020 to get a historical insight and to exclude the specifics of the lockdown period. The extreme event resulted in an average reduction of road traffic of 42%. The decrease in the number of passenger cars ranged from 33.9 to 60.3% per day with the largest decrease on the motorway. Daily averages of heavy goods traffic declined on the motorway and the expressway by 24.6% and 7%, respectively. Traffic characteristics were reflected in a 24–27% decrease in NO2 concentrations at the urban station. The change is smaller than the change in traffic volume, which could be explained by the change in the composition of the vehicle fleet due to the increase in NO2-dominant traffic sources, e.g. diesel heavy goods vehicles. The presented results are relevant for improving air quality and sustainable mobility management in small cities. They highlight the important role of reorganisation of heavy goods traffic in urban logistics.

Keywords:road traffic, extreme event, COVID-19 lockdown, NO2 emissions, meteorological conditions, air pollution

References

  1. [1] Vintar Mally K, Ogrin M. Spatial variations in nitrogen dioxide concentrations in urban Ljubljana, Slovenia. Morav Geogr Reports. 2015;23(3): 27–35. doi: 10.1515/mgr-2015-0015.
  2. [2] Squires FA, et al. Measurements of traffic-dominated pollutant emissions in a Chinese megacity. Atmos Chem Phys. 2020;20(14): 8737–61. doi: 10.5194/acp-20-8737-2020.
  3. [3] Comert G, et al. Evaluating the impact of traffic volume on air quality in South Carolina. Int J Transp Sci Technol. 2020;9(1): 29–41. doi: 10.1016/j.ijtst.2019.05.008.
  4. [4] Rajé F, Tight M, Pope FD. Traffic pollution: A search for solutions for a city like Nairobi. Cities. 2018;82: 100–7. doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2018.05.008.
  5. [5] Ghermandi G, et al. Estimate of secondary NO2 levels at two urban traffic sites using observations and modelling. Sustain. 2020;12(19). doi: 10.3390/su12197897.
  6. [6] Cartaxo E, Valois I, Miranda V, Santos da Costa MG. Issuances of automotive vehicles and the impacts on air quality in the largest city in the Brazilian Amazon. Sustain. 2018;10(11). doi: 10.3390/su10114091.
  7. [7] Lelieveld J, et al. The contribution of outdoor air pollution sources to premature mortality on a global scale. Nature. 2015;525(7569): 367–71. doi: 10.1038/nature15371.
  8. [8] United Nations. World population prospects 2019. Dep Econ Soc Aff World Popul Prospect 2019. 2019;(141).
  9. [9] Burns J, et al. Interventions to reduce ambient air pollution and their effects on health: An abridged Cochrane systematic review. Environ Int. 2020;135: 105400. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2019.105400.
  10. [10] Santana JCC, et al. Effects of air pollution on human health and costs: Current situation in São Paulo, Brazil. Sustain. 2020;12(12). doi: 10.3390/su12124875.
  11. [11] Mavrin I, Knežević D, Jurić I. Impact of diesel engine exhaust gases on environmental pollution and human health. Promet - Traffic - Traffico. 2004;16(4): 197–205. doi: 10.7307/ptt.v16i4.593.
  12. [12] Mavrin I. Eksploatacija benzinskog motora i emisija ugljičnog monoksida [Exploitation of gasoline engines and emissions of carbon monoxide]. Promet - Traffic - Traffico. 1991;3(5): 235–8. https://traffic.fpz.hr/index.php/PROMTT/article/view/466.
  13. [13] Golubić J, Kolar V, Župić T. Influence of aircraft engine exhaust emissions at global level and preventive measures. Promet - Traffic - Traffico. 2004;16(4): 225–30. doi: 10.7307/ptt.v16i4.597.
  14. [14] European Environment Agency. European Union emission inventory report 1990–2014 under the UNECE Convention on Long-range Transboundary Air Pollution (LRTAP). EEA Technical report, 2016.
  15. [15] Rakowska A, et al. Impact of traffic volume and composition on the air quality and pedestrian exposure in urban street canyon. Atmos Environ. 2014;98: 260–70. doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.08.073.
  16. [16] Kelly FJ, Fussell JC. Air pollution and public health: Emerging hazards and improved understanding of risk. Environ Geochem Health. 2015;37(4): 631–49. doi: 10.1007/s10653-015-9720-1.
  17. [17] Ogen Y. Assessing nitrogen dioxide (NO2) levels as a contributing factor to coronavirus (COVID-19) fatality. Sci Total Environ. 2020;726: 138605. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138605.
  18. [18] Golubic J, Mekovec MCA, Suic I. Impact of supersonic aircraft on upper layers of (atmosphere) stratosphere. Promet - Traffic Transp. 2000;12(1): 37–42. https://traffic.fpz.hr/index.php/PROMTT/article/view/734/587.
  19. [19] Zhang H, et al. Relationships between meteorological parameters and criteria air pollutants in three megacities in China. Environ Res. 2015;140: 242–54. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2015.04.004.
  20. [20] Seinfeld J, Pandis S. Atmospheric chemistry and physics: From air pollution to climate change. Third edit. John Wiley & Sons; 2016. p. 26–26.
  21. [21] Zhao Y, et al. Substantial changes in nitrogen dioxide and ozone after excluding meteorological impacts during the COVID-19 outbreak in mainland China. Environ Sci Technol Lett. 2020;7(6): 402–8. doi: 10.1021/acs.estlett.0c00304.
  22. [22] Lee KJ, Kahng H, Kim SB, Park SK. Improving environmental sustainability by characterizing spatial and temporal concentrations of ozone. Sustain. 2018;10(12). doi: 10.3390/su10124551.
  23. [23] Thunis P, et al. Overview of current regional and local scale air quality modelling practices: Assessment and planning tools in the EU. Environ Sci Policy. 2016;65: 13–21. doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2016.03.013.
  24. [24] WHO. WHO Director-General’s opening remarks at the media briefing on COVID-19. World Health Organization. 2020. p. 4. https://www.who.int/director-general/speeches/detail/who-director-general-s-opening-remarks-at-the-media-briefing-on-covid-19---22-december-2021%0Ahttps://www.who.int/dg/speeches/detail/who-director-general-s-opening-remarks-at-the-media-briefing-on-covid [cited 21 Oct. 2020].
  25. [25] Toscano D, Murena F. The effect on air quality of lockdown directives to prevent the spread of SARS-CoV-2 pandemic in Campania Region-Italy: Indications for a sustainable development. Sustain. 2020;12(14): 1–17. doi: 10.3390/su12145558.
  26. [26] Mahato S, Pal S, Ghosh KG. Effect of lockdown amid COVID-19 pandemic on air quality of the megacity Delhi, India. Sci Total Environ. 2020;730. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139086.
  27. [27] Zhang Z, et al. Unprecedented temporary reduction in global air pollution associated with COVID-19 forced confinement: A continental and city scale analysis. Remote Sens. 2020;12(15). doi: 10.3390/rs12152420.
  28. [28] Dantas G, et al. The impact of COVID-19 partial lockdown on the air quality of the city of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Sci Total Environ. 2020;729. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139085.
  29. [29] Muhammad S, Long X, Salman M. COVID-19 pandemic and environmental pollution: A blessing in disguise? Sci Total Environ. 2020;728. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138820.
  30. [30] Nakada LYK, Urban RC. COVID-19 pandemic: Impacts on the air quality during the partial lockdown in São Paulo state, Brazil. Sci Total Environ. 2020;730. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139087.
  31. [31] Patel H, et al. Implications for air quality management of changes in air quality during lockdown in Auckland (New Zealand) in response to the 2020 SARS-CoV-2 epidemic. Sci Total Environ. 2020;746: 141129. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141129.
  32. [32] Wang Y, et al. Four-month changes in air quality during and after the COVID-19 lockdown in six megacities in China. Environ Sci Technol Lett. 2020;7(11):802–8. doi: 10.1021/acs.estlett.0c00605.
  33. [33] Bera B, et al. Significant impacts of COVID-19 lockdown on urban air pollution in Kolkata (India) and amelioration of environmental health. Environ Dev Sustain. 2021;23(5): 6913–40. doi: 10.1007/s10668-020-00898-5.
  34. [34] Bao R, Zhang A. Does lockdown reduce air pollution? Evidence from 44 cities in northern China. Sci Total Environ. 2020;731: 139052. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139052.
  35. [35] Zambrano-Monserrate MA, Ruano MA, Sanchez-Alcalde L. Indirect effects of COVID-19 on the environment. Sci Total Environ. 2020;728: 138813. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138813.
  36. [36] Sahraei MA, Kuşkapan E, Çodur MY. Impact of Covid-19 on public transportation usage and ambient air quality in Turkey. Promet – Traffic&Transportation. 2021;33(2): 179–91. doi: 10.7307/ptt.v33i2.3704.
  37. [37] Sicard P, et al. Amplified ozone pollution in cities during the COVID-19 lockdown. Sci Total Environ. 2020;735: 139542. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139542.
  38. [38] Tobías A, et al. Changes in air quality during the lockdown in Barcelona (Spain) one month into the SARS-CoV-2 epidemic. Sci Total Environ. 2020;726: 138540. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138540.
  39. [39] Dijkstra L, Poelman H. Regional and Urban Policy. Economic Policy. 2012. 16 p.
  40. [40] Lep M, et al. Poti do privlačnega mesta in zadovoljne skupnosti; Celostna prometna strategija mesta Maribor. 2015.
  41. [41] Ježek I, Blond N, Skupinski G, Močnik G. The traffic emission-dispersion model for a Central-European city agrees with measured black carbon apportioned to traffic. Atmos Environ. 2018;184: 177–90. doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.04.028.
  42. [42] Pintarić S, et al. Correlation between atmospheric air pollution by nitrogen dioxide meteorological parameters and the number of patients admitted to the Emergency Department. Medica Jadertina. 2012;42(3–4): 97–102.
  43. [43] Ogrin M, et al. Nitrogen dioxide and black carbon concentrations in Ljubljana. 2018. https://knjigarna.uni-lj.si/sl-SI/product/nitrogen-dioxide-and-black-carbon-concentrations-in-ljubljana/1001387.
  44. [44] Masey N, et al. Influence of wind-speed on short-duration NO2 measurements using Palmes and Ogawa passive diffusion samplers. Atmos Environ. 2017;160: 70–6. doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.04.008.
  45. [45] ARSO. Meteo available online. http://meteo.arso.gov.si/met/sl/app/webmet/#webmet==8Sdwx2bhR2cv0WZ0V2bvEGcw9ydlJWblR3LwVnaz9SYtVmYh9iclFGbt9SaulGdugXbsx3cs9mdl5WahxXYyNGapZXZ8tHZv1WYp5mOnMHbvZXZulWYnwCchJXYtVGdlJnOn0UQQdSf [cited 26 Oct. 2020].
  46. [46] Lep M, Mesarec B. TRAMOB – izdelava načrta trajnostne mobilnosti v mestu in okolici. 2013.
  47. [47] Nacionalni laboratorij za zdravje, okolje in hrano. Kakovost zunanjega zraka v mestni občini Maribor in sosednjih občinah v letu 2018. 2019. https://okolje.maribor.si/data/user_upload/okolje/Zrak/PR18MOM_letno2018.pdf.
  48. [48] Enroth J, et al. Chemical and physical characterization of traffic particles in four different highway environments in the Helsinki metropolitan area. Atmos Chem Phys. 2016;16(9): 5497–512. doi: 10.5194/acp-2015-1026.
Show more


Accelerating Discoveries in Traffic Science |
2024 © Promet - Traffic&Transportation journal