Let's Connect
Follow Us
Watch Us
(+385) 1 2380 262
journal.prometfpz.unizg.hr
Promet - Traffic&Transportation journal

Accelerating Discoveries in Traffic Science

Accelerating Discoveries in Traffic Science

PUBLISHED
21.02.2019
LICENSE
Copyright (c) 2024 Qiang Tu, Lin Cheng, Dawei Li, Jie Ma, Chao Sun

Traffic Paradox Under Different Equilibrium Conditions Considering Elastic Demand

Authors:

Qiang Tu
Southeast University

Lin Cheng
Southeast University

Dawei Li
Southeast University

Jie Ma
Southeast University

Chao Sun
Southeast University

Keywords:traffic paradox, user equilibrium, stochastic user equilibrium, fixed demand, elastic demand, method of successive average

Abstract

Traffic paradox is an important phenomenon which needs attention in transportation network design and traffic management. Previous studies on traffic paradox always examined user equilibrium (UE) or stochastic user equilibrium (SUE) conditions with a fixed traffic demand (FD) and set the travel costs of links as constants under the SUE condition. However, traffic demand is elastic, especially when there are new links added to the network that may induce new traffic demand, and the travel costs of links actually depend on the traffic flows on them. This paper comprehensively investigates the traffic paradox under different equilibrium conditions including the user equilibrium and the stochastic user equilibrium with a fixed and elastic traffic demand. Origin-destination (OD) mean unit travel cost (MUTC) has been chosen as the main index to characterize whether the traffic paradox occurs. The impacts of travelers’ perception errors and travel cost sensitivity on the occurrence of the traffic paradox are also analyzed. The conclusions show that the occurrence of the traffic paradox depends on the traffic demand and equilibrium conditions; higher perception errors of travelers may lead to a better network performance, and a higher travel cost sensitivity will create a reversed traffic paradox. Finally, several appropriate traffic management measures are proposed to avoid the traffic paradox and improve the network performance.

References

  1. Braess D. Über ein Paradoxon aus der Verkehrsplanung. Mathematical Methods of Operations Research. 1968; 12(1): 258-268.

    Murchland J D. Braess's paradox of traffic flow. Transportation Research. 1970; 4(4): 391-394.

    Steinberg R, Zangwill W I. The prevalence of Braess' paradox. Transportation Science. 1983; 17(3): 301-318.

    Dafermos S, Nagurney A. On some traffic equilibrium theory paradoxes. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological. 1984; 18(2): 101-110.

    Calvert B, Keady G. Braess's paradox and power-law nonlinearities in networks. The ANZIAM Journal. 1993; 35(1): 1-22.

    Hallefjord A, Jornsten K, Storoy S. Traffic equilibrium paradoxes when travel demand is elastic. Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research. 1994; 11(1): 41-50.

    Hallefjord A, Jornsten K, Storoy S. Traffic equilibrium paradoxes when travel demand is elastic. Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research. 1994; 11(1): 41-50.

    Pas E I, Principio S L. Braess' paradox: Some new insights. Transporta

Show more
How to Cite
Tu, Q. (et al.) 2019. Traffic Paradox Under Different Equilibrium Conditions Considering Elastic Demand. Traffic&Transportation Journal. 31, 1 (Feb. 2019), 1-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7307/ptt.v31i1.2795.

SPECIAL ISSUE IS OUT

Guest Editor: Eleonora Papadimitriou, PhD

Editors: Marko Matulin, PhD, Dario Babić, PhD, Marko Ševrović, PhD


Accelerating Discoveries in Traffic Science |
2024 © Promet - Traffic&Transportation journal