Let's Connect
Follow Us
Watch Us
(+385) 1 2380 262
journal.prometfpz.unizg.hr
Promet - Traffic&Transportation journal

Accelerating Discoveries in Traffic Science

Accelerating Discoveries in Traffic Science

PUBLISHED
28.02.2014
LICENSE
Copyright (c) 2024 pengcheng yuan, zhicai juan

Risk Route Choice Analysis and the Equilibrium Model under Anticipated Regret Theory

Authors:

pengcheng yuan
JiaoTong University

zhicai juan
JiaoTong University

Keywords:anticipated regret, expected utility, risk decision, route choice, traffic flow,

Abstract

The assumption about travellers’ route choice behaviour has major influence on the traffic flow equilibrium analysis. Previous studies about the travellers’ route choice were mainly based on the expected utility maximization theory. However, with the gradually increasing knowledge about the uncertainty of the transportation system, the researchers have realized that there is much constraint in expected util­ity maximization theory, because expected utility maximiza­tion requires travellers to be ‘absolutely rational’; but in fact, travellers are not truly ‘absolutely rational’. The anticipated regret theory proposes an alternative framework to the tra­ditional risk-taking in route choice behaviour which might be more scientific and reasonable. We have applied the antici­pated regret theory to the analysis of the risk route choosing process, and constructed an anticipated regret utility func­tion. By a simple case which includes two parallel routes, the route choosing results influenced by the risk aversion degree, regret degree and the environment risk degree have been analyzed. Moreover, the user equilibrium model based on the anticipated regret theory has been established. The equivalence and the uniqueness of the model are proved; an efficacious algorithm is also proposed to solve the model. Both the model and the algorithm are demonstrated in a real network. By an experiment, the model results and the real data have been compared. It was found that the model re­sults can be similar to the real data if a proper regret degree parameter is selected. This illustrates that the model can better explain the risk route choosing behaviour. Moreover, it was also found that the traveller’ regret degree increases when the environment becomes more and more risky.

References

  1. Xu, H.L., Zhou, J. and Xu, W.: Cumulative prospect theory-based user equilibrium model for stochastic network, Journal of management science in china[J]. 2011, 7 (14):2~7

    Chen,X.G. Zhou, J., Li, Z.J. and Zhu, Z.T.: A variational Inequality Model for Optimal Travel Choices with Multidimensional DUO, Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management[J], 2009,23(1):23~28

    Huang, H.J.: Dynamic Modeling of Urban Transportation Networks and Analysis of its Travel Behaviors, Chinese journal of management[J], 2005, 2(1):18~22

    Shiller, R J.: Market Volatility and Investor Behavior. American Economic Review[J], 1990, 80(2): 58~62

    Kahneman, D. and Riepe, M.: Aspects of Investor Psychology. Journal of Portfolio Management[J], 1998, 24(4): 52~65

    Zhang, H.Y.: The comparative analysis between expected utility and non-expected utility preference functions[J], Mathematic Economics, 2000,17(3):29~36

    Thaler, R.H.: Advances in Behavioral Finance. New York: Russell Sage Foundation[M], 1993

Show more
How to Cite
yuan, p. (et al.) 2014. Risk Route Choice Analysis and the Equilibrium Model under Anticipated Regret Theory. Traffic&Transportation Journal. 26, 1 (Feb. 2014), 33-43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7307/ptt.v26i1.1218.

SPECIAL ISSUE IS OUT

Guest Editor: Eleonora Papadimitriou, PhD

Editors: Marko Matulin, PhD, Dario Babić, PhD, Marko Ševrović, PhD


Accelerating Discoveries in Traffic Science |
2024 © Promet - Traffic&Transportation journal