Inland terminals are becoming an increasingly important factor for disburdening port storage capacities and the expansion of the port gravitational areas. The above defines inland terminals as facilities with prolonged activities of seaports, or an integral part of the port. Due to increased interest in the development of inland terminals, the literature in the field of inland terminals since the beginning of its research (1980) to the latest research in 2015 has been analysed
and revised. The review will summarize the literature related to development, classification, technological processes and location of inland terminals. In the end, the paper identifies a new proposition for further research based on the current trends and developments in inland terminals as an important factor of intermodal transport.
Alphaliner Cellular Fleet Forecast. Available from: http://www.alphaliner.com/liner2/research_files/liner_studies/nofleet/Alphaliner-FleetForecast-2016-01.pdf
Wilmsmeier M, Monios J, Lambert B. The directional development of intermodal freight corridors in relation to inland terminals. Journal of Transport Geography. 2011;19:1379-1386.
Ferrari C, Parola F, Gattorna E. Measuring the quality of port hinterland accessibility: The Ligurian case. Transport Policy. 2011;18(2):382-391.
Pellegram A. Strategic land use planning for freight: the experience of the Port of London Authority, 1994–1999. Transport Policy. 2001;8(1):11-18.
Frémont A, Franc P. Hinterland transportation in Europe: Combined transport versus road transport. Journal of Transport Geography. 2010;18(4):548-556.
Munford C. Buenos Aires – congestion and the dry port solution. Cargo Systems International: The Journal of ICHCA. 1980;7(10):26-27.
United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD). Handbook on the management and operation of dry ports. Geneva: UNCTAD; 1991.
Beresford AKC, Dubey RC. Handbook on the Management and Operation of Dry Ports. Geneva: UNCTAD; 1990.
Slack B. Intermodal transportation in North America and the development of inland load centers. Professional Geographer. 1990;42(1):72-83.
Slack B. Satellite terminals: a local solution to hub congestion?. Journal of Transport Geography. 1999;7:241-246.
Notteboom TE. Concentration and load centre development in the European container port system. Journal of Transport Geography. 1997;5(2):99-115.
Van Klink HA, Van den Berg G. Gateways and intermodalism. Journal of Transport Geography. 1998;6:1-9.
McCalla RJ. Global change, local pain: intermodal seaport terminals and their service areas. Journal of Transport Geography. 1999;7:247-254.
Woxenius J, Sjöstedt L, Hellgren J. Five Traffic Designs in Combined Transport Systems – A theoretical discussion. Logistyka – Engineering Machines Problems. 1994;2(2):111-127.
Frémont A, Franc P. Hinterland transportation in Europe: Combined transport versus road transport. Journal of Transport Geography. 2010;18(4):548-556.
Van der Berg R, de Langen PW. Hinterland strategies of port authorities: A case study of the port of Barcelona. Research in Transportation Economics. 2011;33(1):6-14.
Podevins O. Sea Port system and the inland terminals network in the enlarged European Union. LINDI. International Symposium on Logistics and Industrial Informatics. Wildau. Germany; 2007. p. 151-155.
Rodrigue JP, De Brie J, Fremont A. Functions and actors of inland ports: European and North American dynamics. Journal of Transport Geography. 2010;18(4):519-529.
Veenstra AW, Zuidwijs R, van Asperen E. The extended gate concept for container terminals: Expanding the notion of dry ports. Maritime Economics and Logistics. 2012;14(1):14-32.
Monios J, Wilmsmeier G. Giving a direction to port regionalisation. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice. 2012;46(10):1551-1561.
Van der Ber R, De Langen P. Towards an ‘inland terminal centred’ value proposition. Maritime Policy & Management: The flagship journal of international shipping and port research, 2015;42(5):499-515.
Monios J. Identifying Governance Relationships Between Intermodal Terminals and Logistics Platforms. Transport Reviews. 2015;35(6):767-791.
Wiegmans B, Witte P, Spit T. Inland port performance: a statistical analysis of Dutch inland ports. Transportation Research Procedia. 2015;8:145-154.
Beresford A, Pettit S, Xu Q, Williams S. A study of dry port development in China. Maritime Economics & Logistics. 2012;14:73-98.
Roso V. The Dry Port Concept [PhD thesis]. Göteborg. Chalmers University of Technology; 2009.
Zimmer, NR. Designing intermodal terminals for efficiency. Transportation Research Circular 459. 1996:6:99-109.
European Commission. Freight intermodality. Transport RTD Programme of the 4th Framework Programme, Luxemburg; 2001.
Harrison R, McCray JP, Prozzi J. Inland port transportation evaluation guide (CTR 4083-P4). Center for Transportation Research (CTR). University of Texas; 2004.
United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (ESCAP); 2010.
Monios J. The role of inland terminal development in the hinterland access strategies of Spanish ports. Research in Transportation Economics. 2011;33:59-66.
Integrating Logistics Centre Networks in the Baltic Sea Region. Feasibility Study on the Network Operation of Hinterland Hubs (Dry Port Concept) to Improve and Modernise Ports' Connections to the Hinterland and to Improve Networking. Aalborg, Denmark: FDT - Association of Danish Transport and Logistics Centres; 2007.
Roso V, Woxenius J, Lumsden K. The dry port concept: connecting container seaports with the hinterland. Journal of Transport Geography. 2009;27(5):338-345.
Roso V. The dry port concept − applications in Sweden. Proceedings of Logistics Research Network. Plymouth: International Logistics and Supply Chain Management; 2009.
[Notteboom TE, Rodrigue JP. Inland Terminals within North American and European Supply Chains, Transport and Communications Bulletin for Asia and the Pacific. United Nations. Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific. 2009;78:1-57.
Rodrigue JP. The Thruport Concept and Transmodal Rail Freight Distribution in North America. Journal of Transport Geography. 2008;16(4):233-246.
Rodrigue JP, Notteboom TE. Comparative North American and European Gateway Logistics: The Regionalism of Freight Distribution. Journal of Transport Geography. 2010;18(4):497-507.
Rodrigue JP, Notteboom TE. The terminalization of supply chains: reassessing port-hinterland logistical relationships. Maritime Policy and Management. 2009;36(2):165-183.
Notteboom TE, Rodrigue JP. Port Regionalization: Towards a New Phase in Port Development. Maritime Policy & Management. 2005;32(3):297-313.
Ng AKY, Gujar GC. Government policies, efficiency and competitiveness: The case of dry ports in India. Transport Policy. 2009;16:232-239.
Ng AKY, Padilha F, Pallis AA. Institutions, bureaucratic and logistical roles of dry ports: the Brazilian experiences. Journal of Transport Geography. 2013;27:46-55.
Roso V, Woxenius J, Olandersson G. Organisation of Swedish dry port terminals. Göteborg, Sweden: Chalmers University of Technology; 2006.
Jaržemskis A, Vasiliauskas AV. Research on dry port concept as intermodal node, Transport. 2007;22(3):207-213.
Witte B, Wiegmans B, van Oort F, Spit, T. Governing inland ports: a multi-dimensional approach to addressing inland port–city challenges in European transport corridors. Journal of Transport Geography. 2014;36:42-52.
Wiegmans, B, Louw, E. Changing Port City Relationships at Amsterdam: A New Phase in the Interface?. Journal of Transport Geography. 2011;19(4):575-583.
Daamen TA, Vries I. Governing the European port–city interface: institutional impacts on spatial projects between city and port. Journal of Transport Geography. 2013;27(1):4-13.
Iannone F. The private and social cost efficiency of port hinterland container distribution through a regional logistics system. Transportation Research Part A. 2012;46:1424-1448.
Rodrigue JP. The Geography of Transport Systems. 3rd ed. New York: Routledge; 2013.
Jarašūniene A. Optimisation of technological processes in terminals. Transport. 2004;19(5):207-213.
Abacoumkin C, Ballis A. Development of an expert system for the evaluation of conventional and innovative technologies in the intermodal transport area. European Journal of Operational Research. 2004;152:410-419.
Carrese S, Tatarelli L. Optimizing the stacking of the Intermodal Transport Units in an inland terminal: an heuristic procedure. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2011;20:994-1003.
Gronalt M, Häuslmayer H, Posset M, Rojas-Navas T. SimConT – Theory and Practice in Simulation of Binnenland Container Terminnals. The 14th International Conference on Harbour, Maritime Multimodal Logistics Modelling and Simulation. Rome, Italy; 2011.
Kayikci Y. A conceptual model for intermodal freight logistics centre location decisions. The Sixth International Conference on City Logistics. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2010;2(3):6297-6311.
Sörensen K, Vanovermeire C, Busschaert S. Efficient metaheuristics to solve the intermodal terminal location problem. Computers & Operations Research. 2012;39:2079-2090.
Arnold P, Peeters D, Thomas I, Marchand H. Pour une localisation optimale des centre de transbordement intermodaux entre re´seaux de transport: formulation et extensions. The Canadian Geographer. 2001;45(3):427-436.
Racunica I, Wynter L. Optimal location of intermodal freight hubs. Transportation Research Part B. 2005;39:453-477.
Crainic TG. Service network design in freight transportation. European Journal of Operations Research. 2000;122(2):272-288.
Feng CM, Huang HH. The economic evaluation of intercity intermodal logistics. Journal of the Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies. 2005;6:2921-2936.
Lv RS, Li C. Analysis on Location Selection of Dry Ports Based on ANP, Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, 2009. IE&EM '09. 16th International Conference on Bejing. 2009:638-641.
Wang Y, Wang J. The Optimal Location of Dry Port: A Case Study of the Hinterland of Western Side of the Taiwan Straits Port Group. 2010 IEEE 17Th International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (IE&EM). Xiamen; 2010. p. 1864-1868.
Limbourg S, Jourquin B. Optimal rail-road container terminal locations on the European network. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review. 2009;45(4):551-63.
Sirikijpanichkul A, Van Dam HK, Ferreira L, Lukszo Z. Optimizing the Location of Intermodal Freight Hubs: An Overview of the Agent Based Modelling Approach. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology. 2007;7(4):71-81.
Macharis C, Pekin E, Rietveld P. Location Analysis Model for Belgian Intermodal Terminals: towards an integration of the modal choice variables. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2011;20:79-89.
da Silva Portugal L, Vaz Morgado A, Lima Júnior O. Location of cargo terminals in metropolitan areas of developing countries: the Brazilian case. Journal of Transport Geography. 2011;19(4):900-910.
Ghodratnama A, Tavakkoli-Moghaddam R, Baboli A. Comparing three proposed meta-heuristics to solve a new p-hub location-allocation problem. International Journal of Engineering, Transactions C: Aspects. 2013;26(9):1043-1058.
Woo SH, Pettit SJ, Beresford AKC. An assessment of the integration of seaports into supply chains using a structural equation model. Supply Chain Management: an International Journal. 2013;18(3):235-252.
Rožić T, Petrović M, Ogrizović D. Container Transport Flows as a Prerequisite for Determination of Inland Terminal Location. Pomorstvo: Scientific Journal of Maritime Research, 2014;28(1):3-9.
Ambrosino D, Sciomachen A. Location of Mid-range Dry Ports in Multimodal Logistic Networks. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2014;108:118-128.
Ayaci I, Kammarti R, Ksouri M, Borne P. A genetic algorithm to solve the container storage space allocation problem. International conference on Computational Intelligence and Vehicular System (CIVS). Seoul, South Korea; 2010. Available from: http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1303/1303.1051.pdf
Guest Editor: Eleonora Papadimitriou, PhD
Editors: Dario Babić, PhD; Marko Matulin, PhD; Marko Ševrović, PhD.
The mission of our journal is to provide high quality communication of research results, which is crucial for the effectiveness of scientific research, the promotion of scientific information, new ideas, and original research in the field of traffic and transportation engineering.
1848-4069
0353-5320
Proud publisher
Accelerating Discoveries in Traffic Science |
2024 © Promet - Traffic&Transportation journal
