Rates the Ships Must Pay to Deliver the Oil Sludge as an Incentive to Improve Port Waste Green Logistics

Quynh LX, Hens L, Stoyanov S. Water management in the framework of environmental management systems in Bulgarian seaports. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Parts A/B/C. 2011;36(5): 141-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.pce.2010.05.004

Corchón L. Two Stage Games. In: Corchón L, editor. Theories of Imperfectly Competitive Markets. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 1996. p. 124-63.

Assis MRM, Bittencourt LF. MultiCloud Tournament: A cloud federation approach to prevent Free-Riders by encouraging resource sharing. Journal of Network and Computer Applications. 2020;166: 102694. DOI: 10.1016/j.jnca.2020.102694

MARPOL. Consolidated edition 2017. Resolution MEPC.187(59); 2017.

MARPOL. Unified interpretations of regulations 1.24, 12, 27 and 28.3.3 of MARPOL Annex I; 2016.

Wiewiora A, Listewnik J. Integrated bilge water treatment system. Journal of Machine Construction and Maintenance. 2007(3): 223-30.

Pérez I, González MM, Jiménez JL. Size matters? Evaluating the drivers of waste from ships at ports in Europe. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment. 2017;57: 403-12. DOI: 10.1016/j.trd.2017.10.009

Nelissen D, Faber J. The Management of Ship-Generated Waste On-board Ships. CE Delft; 2017.

De Langen PW, Nijdam MN. Charging systems for waste reception facilities in ports and the level playing field: A case from North-West Europe. Coast Manage. 2007;36(1): 109-24. DOI: 10.1080/08920750701682064

EU-Commission. Directive on port reception facilities for the delivery of waste from ships. 883. EU2019.

EMSA. Study on the Delivery of Ship-Generated Waste and Cargo Residues to Port Reception Facilities in EU Ports. EMSA; 2012.

Deja A. Organisation of the reception of ship-generated wastes and cargo residues illustrated by selected examples of European Union seaports. Scientific Journals, Maritime University of Szczecin. 2013;33(105): 16-21.

EMSA. Technical Recommendations on the Implementation of Directive 2000/59/EC on Port Reception Facilities. EMSA; 2016.

Turocy TL, Stengel Bv. Game Theory. In: Bidgoli H, editor. Encyclopedia of Information Systems. New York: Elsevier; 2003. p. 403-20.

Rasmusen E. Games and Information: An Introduction to Game Theory. Wiley-Blackwell; 2006.

Tuljak-Suban D. Competition or cooperation in a hub and spoke-shipping network: The case of the North Adriatic container terminals. Transport. 2018;33(2): 429-36. DOI: 10.3846/16484142.2016.1261368

Naima S, Odd IL. Container terminal concessions: A game theory application to the case of the ports of Pakistan. Maritime Economics & Logistics. 2010;12(3): 237-62. DOI: 10.1057/mel.2010.8

Nie P-Y. Dynamic discrete-time multi-leader–follower games with leaders in turn. Computers & Mathematics with Applications. 2011;61(8): 2039-43. DOI: 10.1016/j.nahs.2006.02.001

Chong EKP, Zak SH. An Introduction to Optimization. Wiley; 2013.

EU-Commission. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions; 2015.

Notteboom TE, Vernimmen B. The effect of high fuel costs on liner service configuration in container shipping. Journal of Transport Geography. 2009;17(5): 325-37. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2008.05.003

Notteboom T, Cariou P, editors. Fuel surcharge practices of container shipping lines: Is it about cost recovery or revenue making. Proceedings of the 2009 International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME) Conference, 24-26 June 2009, Copenhagen, Denmark; 2009.

EU-Commission. Study on Differentiated Port Infrastructure Charges to Promote Environmentally Friendly Maritime Transport Activities and Sustainable Transportation; 2017.