The paper is based on the question whether the existing (legislation determined) method for determining the visibility length on passive protected level railroad crossings insures the relevant level of traffic safety. It has been recognised that using of such method does not provide stopping of road driver vehicles in front of railroad crossing in all conditions. Based on such conclusion a new approach to determining visibility length on passive protected level railroad crossing is proposed. The new approach is based on the assumption that it is necessary, primarily on level railroad crossings with local roads to recognize the worst possible and expected road and weather conditions. The testing of the proposed method in the real environment has shown that at lower speeds of road vehicles there is almost no difference, and that important benefits are recognised for the speeds of 30 and 50km/h where longer stopping distances of road vehicles have been detected (road vehicle can stop safely in front of a rail crossing) with almost the same visibility lengths. The use of the proposed method could have important impact on the increase of traffic safety on passive protected level railroad crossings.
EU Safety at level crossings, 2nd report of the working group on level crossings, High Level Group Road Safety, European Commission DG Energy and Transport, Brussels, 19 December 2003
Theeg, G., Švalov, D., Schone, E., Level Crossings, Railway signalling and interlocking, Eurailpress 2009
Ellinghaus, D., Steinbrecher J., Das Kreuz mit dem Andreaskreuz (the problems relating to St Andrews Cross), 2005
Sever, D., Radkovič, V., Godec, A., Field of transparency as urgent and necessary element of assuring of safety on level railroad crossings protected with traffic sign saltire, RIMC 2010
Zakon o javnih cestah - ZJC –UPB1, Ur.l. 33/06, 45/08, 42/09
Zakon o varnosti v železniškem prometu – ZVZelP, Ur.l. 61/07
Pravilnik o nivojskih prehodih, Ur.l. RS št. 85/08
Juvanc, A., Geometrijski elementi cestne osi in vozišča, UL FGG, March 2005
AASHTO, »Policy on geometric design of streets and highways«, Washington, DC, 2001
Stopping sight distance and decision sight distance, Discussion paper No. 8.A, Oregon Department of transportation, Salem, Oregon, USA
Sever, D, Ljubič Mrgole, A.M., Visibility modelling on passive protected levelled railroad crossings, CADAM 2011, Vela Luka 2011
Sever, D, Radković, V, Usage of 3D GIS tools to verify the field of transparency on level railroad crossings protected with passive safety measures, 1. B.H. Congress on railways, Sarajevo 2011
Guest Editor: Eleonora Papadimitriou, PhD
Editors: Dario Babić, PhD; Marko Matulin, PhD; Marko Ševrović, PhD.
Accelerating Discoveries in Traffic Science |
2024 © Promet - Traffic&Transportation journal