Let's Connect
Follow Us
Watch Us
(+385) 1 2380 262
journal.prometfpz.unizg.hr
Promet - Traffic&Transportation journal

Accelerating Discoveries in Traffic Science

Accelerating Discoveries in Traffic Science

PUBLISHED
28.02.2019
LICENSE
Copyright (c) 2024 Mladen Dragan Krstić, Snežana Radoman Tadić, Nikolina Brnjac, Slobodan Zečević

Intermodal Terminal Handling Equipment Selection Using a Fuzzy Multi-criteria Decision-making Model

Authors:

Mladen Dragan Krstić
University of Belgrade, Faculty of Transport and Traffic Engineering

Snežana Radoman Tadić

Nikolina Brnjac
University of Zagreb, Faculty of Transport and Traffic Sciences

Slobodan Zečević
University of Belgrade, Faculty of Transport and Traffic Engineering

Keywords:intermodal transport, terminal, handling equipment, fuzzy step-wise weight assessment ratio analysis, fuzzy best-worst method

Abstract

Intermodal transport enables energy, costs and time savings, improves the service quality and supports sustainable development. The basic element of the intermodal transport system is an intermodal terminal, whose efficiency largely depends on the subsystems’ technologies. Accordingly, the topic of this paper is the evaluation and the selection of the appropriate handling equipment within the intermodal terminal. As the decision-making on the handling equipment is influenced by different economic, technical, technological and other criteria, the appropriate multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) methods have to be applied in order to solve the problem. In this paper, a novel hybrid model which combines the fuzzy step-wise weight assessment ratio analysis (FSWARA) and the fuzzy best-worst method (FBWM) is developed. The defined model is applied for solving the case study of selecting adequate handling equipment for the planned intermodal terminal in Belgrade. The reach stacker is selected as the most adequate handling equipment since it suits best the characteristics of the planned terminal in the given conditions and in relation to the defined criteria. Solving the case study demonstrated the justification for using the MCDM methods to solve these kinds of problems as well as the applicability of the proposed MCDM model.

References

  1. Barysienė J. A multi-criteria evaluation of container terminal technologies applying the COPRAS-G method. Transport. 2012;27(4): 364–372.

    European Commission (EC). White Paper: Roadmap to a Single European Transport Area – Towards a Competitive and Resource Efficient Transport System. Brussels; 2011 Available from: http:// eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX: 52011DC0144:EN:NOT [Accessed 16th March 2018]

    ECMT - European Conference of Ministers of Transport. Terminology on combined transport. Brussels; 1993. Available from ftp://ftp.cordis.europa.eu/pub/transport/docs/ intermodal_freight transport_en.pdf. [Accessed 16th March 2018]

    UNECE - United Nations Economic Commission for Europe. Illustrated glossary for transport statistics. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union; 2009. Available from: http://www.unece.org/fileadmin/ DAM/trans/main/ wp6/pdfdocs/glossen4.pdf. [Accessed 16th March 2018]

    Lau HYK, Zhao Y. Integrated scheduling of handling equip

Show more
How to Cite
Krstić, M. (et al.) 2019. Intermodal Terminal Handling Equipment Selection Using a Fuzzy Multi-criteria Decision-making Model. Traffic&Transportation Journal. 31, 1 (Feb. 2019), 89-100. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7307/ptt.v31i1.2949.

SPECIAL ISSUE IS OUT

Guest Editor: Eleonora Papadimitriou, PhD

Editors: Marko Matulin, PhD, Dario Babić, PhD, Marko Ševrović, PhD


Accelerating Discoveries in Traffic Science |
2024 © Promet - Traffic&Transportation journal