Identifying Operational Benefits of the Arrival Management System – A KPI-Based Experimental Method by Evaluating Radar Trajectories

International Civil Aviation Organization. The aviation system block upgrades – The framework for global harmonization. Montreal, Quebec, Canada: ICAO; 2016.

Guzhva VS, Abdelghany A, Lipps T. Experimental approach to NextGen benefits estimation: A case of single- airline aircraft arrival management system. Journal of Air Transport Management. 2014;35: 108-116. DOI: 10.1016/j.jairtraman.2013.12.003

European Organization for the Safety of Air Navigation. Review of current KPIs and proposal for new ones. Brussels, Belgium: EUROCONTROL; 2017.

European Organization for the Safety of Air Navigation. Arrival Manager, implementation guidelines and lessons learned. Brussels, Belgium: EUROCONTROL; 2010.

Bennell JA, Mesgarpour M, Potts CN. Airport runway scheduling. Annals of Operation Research. 2013;204(1): 204-249. DOI: 10.1007/s10479-012-1268-1

Zhang JF, et al. Criteria selection and multi-objective optimization of aircraft landing problem. Journal of Air Transport Management. 2020;82: 101734. DOI: 10.1016/j.jairtraman.2019.101734

Bennell JA, Mesgarpour M, Potts CN. Dynamic scheduling of aircraft landings. European Journal of Operational Research. 2017;258(1): 315-327. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2016.08.015

Vadlamani S, Hosseini S. A novel heuristic approach for solving aircraft landing problem with single runway. Journal of Air Transport Management. 2014;40: 144-148. DOI: 10.1016/j.jairtraman.2014.06.009

Lieder A, Briskorn D, Stolletz R. A dynamic programming approach for the aircraft landing problem with aircraft classes. European Journal of Operational Research. 2015;243(1): 61-69. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2014.11.027

Solving G, Clark JP. Scheduling of airport runway operations using stochastic branch and bound methods. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies. 2014;45(8): 119-137. DOI: 10.1016/j.trc.2014.02.021

Zhang JF, et al. A new meta-heuristic approach for aircraft landing problem. Transactions of Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics. 2020;37(2): 197-208. DOI: 10.16356/j.1005•1120.2020.02.003

Hu XB, Di Paolo E. Binary-representation-based genetic algorithm for aircraft arrival sequencing and scheduling. IEEE Transaction on Intelligent Transportation System. 2008;9(2): 301-310. DOI: 10.1109/TITS.2008.922884

Salehipour A, Modarres M, Naeni LM. An efficient hybrid meta-heuristic for aircraft landing problem. Computers & Operations Research. 2013;40(1): 207-213. DOI: 10.1016/j.cor.2012.06.004

Girish BG. An efficient hybrid particle swarm optimization algorithm in a rolling horizon framework for the aircraft landing problem. Applied Soft Computing. 2016;44: 200-221. DOI: 10.1016/j.asoc.2016.04.011

Zhan ZH, et al. An efficient ant colony system based on recording horizon control. IEEE Transaction on Intelligent Transportation System. 2010;11(2): 399-412. DOI: 10.1109/TITS.2010.2044793

Harikiopoulo D, Neogi N. Polynomial-time feasibility condition for multiclass aircraft sequencing on a single-runway airport. IEEE Transaction on Intelligent Transportation System. 2011;12(1): 2-13. DOI: 10.1109/TITS.2010.2055856

Sama M, et al. Scheduling models for optimal aircraft traffic control at busy airports: Tardiness, priorities, equity and violations considerations. Omega-International Journal of Management Science. 2017;67: 81-98. DOI: 10.1016/j.omega.2016.04.003

Prevot T, et al. Efficient arrival management utilizing ATC and aircraft automation. In: International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction in Aeronautics, HCI-Aero 2000, September 2000, Toulouse, France. Toulouse, France: ACM; 2000. p. 1-11.

Andersson K, et al. Optimization-based analysis of collaborative airport arrival planning. Transportation Science. 2003;37(4): 422-433. DOI: 10.1287/trsc.37.4.422.23274

Meyn LA, Erzberger H. Airport arrival capacity benefits due to improved scheduling accuracy. In: AIAA 5th Aviation Technology, Integration, and Operations Conference, 26-28 September 2005, Arlington, Virginia, USA. Reston, VA, USA: AIAA; 2005. p. 7376-7386.

Miyazawa Y, et al. Potential benefits of arrival time assignment: Dynamic programming trajectory optimization applied to the Tokyo international airport. In: 11th USA/Europe Air Traffic Management Research and Development Seminar, 23-26 June 2015, Lisbon, Portugal. Lisbon, Portugal: FAA & EUROCONTROL; 2015.

European Organization for the Safety of Air Navigation. Performance review body of Single European Sky. Brussels, Belgium: EUROCONTROL; 2016.

International Civil Aviation Organization. Manual on global performance of the air navigation system. Doc 9883. Montreal, Quebec, Canada: ICAO; 2007.

Civil Air Navigation Services Organization. Recommended KPIs for measuring air navigation service providers operational performance. Hoofddorp, Netherland: CANSO; 2015.

European Organization for the Safety of Air Navigation. Performance framework. Brussels, Belgium: EUROCONTROL; 2017.

Federal Aviation Administration of USA. NEXTGEN performance snapshots. Washington D.C., USA: FAA; 2015.

Olive X, Morio J. Clustering of air traffic flows around airports. Aerospace Science Technology. 2019;84: 776-781. DOI: 10.1016/j.ast.2018.11.031

He XF, Cai D, Niyogi P. Laplacian score for feature selection. In: Weiss Y, Scholkopf B, Platt JC. (eds.) NIPS’05: Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems: Natural and Synthetic, NIPS’05, December 2005, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA: MIT Press; 2006. p. 507-514.

Daniel WW. Spearman rank correlation coefficient. Applied Nonparametric Statistics. 2nd ed. Boston: PWS-Kent Publishing Company; 1990. p. 358-365.