Let's Connect
Follow Us
Watch Us
(+385) 1 2380 262
journal.prometfpz.unizg.hr
Promet - Traffic&Transportation journal

Accelerating Discoveries in Traffic Science

Accelerating Discoveries in Traffic Science

PUBLISHED
-
LICENSE
Copyright (c) 2024 Iman Aghayan, Nima Noii, Mehmet Metin Kunt

Extended Traffic Crash Modelling through Precision and Response Time Using Fuzzy Clustering Algorithms Compared with Multi-layer Perceptron

Authors:

Iman Aghayan

Nima Noii

Mehmet Metin Kunt

Keywords:fuzzy subtractive, fuzzy C-means, hierarchical clustering, Kmeans clustering, multi-layer perceptron, traffic crash severity

Abstract

This paper compares two fuzzy clustering algorithms – fuzzy subtractive clustering and fuzzy C-means clustering – to a multi-layer perceptron neural network for their ability to predict the severity of crash injuries and to estimate the response time on the traffic crash data. Four clustering algorithms – hierarchical, K-means, subtractive clustering, and fuzzy C-means clustering – were used to obtain the optimum number of clusters based on the mean silhouette coefficient and R-value before applying the fuzzy clustering algorithms. The best-fit algorithms were selected according to two criteria: precision (root mean square, R-value, mean absolute errors, and sum of square error) and response time (t). The highest R-value was obtained for the multi-layer perceptron (0.89), demonstrating that the multi-layer perceptron had a high precision in traffic crash prediction among the prediction models, and that it was stable even in the presence of outliers and overlapping data. Meanwhile, in comparison with other prediction models, fuzzy subtractive clustering provided the lowest value for response time (0.284 second), 9.28 times faster than the time of multi-layer perceptron, meaning that it could lead to developing an on-line system for processing data from detectors and/or a real-time traffic database. The model can be extended through improvements based on additional data through induction procedure.

References

  1. Donnell, E.T., Mason Jr. J.M. Predicting the frequency of median barrier crashes on Pennsylvania Interstate Highways. accident Analysis & Prevention 2006;38 (3):590–599.

    Lord, D. Methodology for estimating the variance and confidence intervals of the estimate of the product of baseline models and AMFs. Accident Analysis & Prevention 2008;40 (3):1013–1017.

    Mussone, L., Ferrari, A. and Oneta, M. An analysis of urban collisions using an artificial intelligence model. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 1999;31 (6):705–718.

    Zhang, J., Lindsay, J., Clarke, K., Robbins, G. and Mao, Y. Factors affecting the severity of motor vehicle traffic crashes involving elderly drivers in Ontario. Accident Anal. Prev. 2000;32 (1):117–125.

    Valent, F., Schiava, F., Savonitto, C., Gallo, T., Brusaferro, S. and Barbone, F. Risk factors for fatal road accidents in Udine, Italy. Accident Analysis and Prevention 2002;34 (1):71–84.

    Yin, H., Wong, S.C., Xu, J. and Wong, C.K. Urban traffic flow pr

Show more
How to Cite
Aghayan, I. (et al.) 1900. Extended Traffic Crash Modelling through Precision and Response Time Using Fuzzy Clustering Algorithms Compared with Multi-layer Perceptron. Traffic&Transportation Journal. 24, 6 (Jan. 1900), 455-467. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7307/ptt.v24i6.1197.

SPECIAL ISSUE IS OUT

Guest Editor: Eleonora Papadimitriou, PhD

Editors: Marko Matulin, PhD, Dario Babić, PhD, Marko Ševrović, PhD


Accelerating Discoveries in Traffic Science |
2024 © Promet - Traffic&Transportation journal