Conflicts in traffic stream have been detected by different safety performance indicators. This study aims to empirically investigate the differences between different indicators in detecting rear-end conflicts and assessing the risk in an uninterrupted flow. Micro-level data of a 24-hr traffic stream (including 6,657 vehicles) were captured using inductive loop detectors installed on a rural freeway section. Different indicators (Time Headway (H), Time to Collision (TTC), Proportion of Stopping Distance (PSD), Deceleration Rate to Avoid Collision (DRAC) and Stopping Distance Index (SDI)) were used to measure each car following event in a bivalent state (safe/unsafe). Unsafe events associated with each indicator were detected and common unsafe events characterized by different indicators were identified. Temporal distributions of rear-end collision risks associated with each indicator at 15-min intervals were also compared. Finally, the 15-min risk values based on different indicators were categorized and compared across three levels (Low, Medium and High). Data mining and statistical techniques showed that while SDI is the single most conservative indicator, DRAC and TTC detect a few risky events but very equal ones. In almost all conflicts associated with TTC, headway is still lower than the critical threshold. However, there exist considerable risky events based on headway which are still safe according to TTC. Comparison of PSD and TTC also declares that almost all conflicts associated with TTC are also risky according to PSD.
Hauer E. Observational Before-After Studies in Road Safety. Emerald Group Publishing Limited; 1997; Available from: http://www.amazon.com/dp/0080430538
Lord D, Mannering F. The statistical analysis of crash-frequency data: A review and assessment of methodological alternatives. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice. 2010 Jun;44(5):291–305; Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965856410000376
Guido G, Saccomanno F, Vitale A, Astarita V, Festa D. Comparing Safety Performance Measures Obtained from Video Capture Data. Journal of Transportation Engineering. 2010 Oct 9;1(1):165–165; Available from: http://ascelibrary.org/doi/abs/10.1061/%28ASCE%29TE.1943-5436.0000230
Perkins SR, Harris JI. Criteria for Traffic Conflict Characteristics Signalized Intersections. Research Laboratories, General Motors Corporation; 1967; Available from: http://books.google.com/books?id=7-YxHAAACAAJ
Amundsen FH, Hyden C. Proceedings of The First Workshop on Traffic Conflicts. Oslo, TTI, Oslo, Norway and LTH Lund, Sweden; 1977.
Cunto FJC, Saccomanno FF. Microlevel Traffic Simulation Method for Assessing Crash Potential at Intersections. 2007 [cited 2012 Jun 5]. Available from: http://trid.trb.org/view.aspx?id=802073
Hauer E, Garder P. Research into the validity of the traffic conflicts technique. Accident Analysis & Prevention. 1986 Dec;18(6):471–81; Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0001457586900205
Davis GA, Hourdos J, Xiong H, Chatterjee I. Outline for a causal model of traffic conflicts and crashes. Accident Analysis & Prevention. 2011 Nov;43(6):1907–19; Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0001457511001205
Laureshyn A. Application of automated video analysis to road user behaviour [PhD Thesis]. [Sweden]: Lund University; 2010.
Gettman D, Head L. Surrogate Safety Measures From Traffic Simulation Models, Final Report. Federal Highway Administration (FHWA); 2003. Report No.: FHWA-RD-03-050; Available from: http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/publications/research/safety/03050/03050.pdf
Cunto F. Assessing Safety Performance of Transportation Systems using Microscopic Simulation [PhD Thesis]. [Waterloo, Ontario]: University of Waterloo; 2008.
Pirdavani A, Brijs T, Bellemans T, Wets G. Evaluation of traffic safety at un-signalized intersections using microsimulation: a utilization of proximal safety indicators. Advances in Transportation Studies. 2010 Nov;22. Available from: http://trid.trb.org/view.aspx?id=1090852
Laureshyn A, Svensson Å, Hydén C. Evaluation of traffic safety, based on micro-level behavioural data: Theoretical framework and first implementation. Accident Analysis & Prevention. 2010 Nov;42(6):1637–46; Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0001457510001041
Minderhoud MM, Bovy PHL. Extended time-to-collision measures for road traffic safety assessment. Accident Analysis & Prevention. 2001 Jan;33(1):89–97; Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0001457500000191
Vogel K. A comparison of headway and time to collision as safety indicators. Accident Analysis & Prevention. 2003 May;35(3):427–33; Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0001457502000222
Oh C, Oh J, Min J. Real-Time Detection of Hazardous Traffic Events on Freeways. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board. 2009 Dec 1;2129(1):35–44; Available from: http://trb.metapress.com/content/38081208638g3574/?genre=article&id=doi%3a10.3141%2f2129-05
Heijer T, Wiersma E, Polak PH. Proposed safety criteria for traffic control on motorways. Safety Science. 1997 Jun;26(1–2):141–54; Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925753597000350
Transportation Research Board of the National Academies. Highway Capacity Manual 2010. Washington DC, USA; 2010. Available from: http://books.trbbookstore.org/hcm10.aspx
Mulder M, Abbink DA, Van Paassen MM, Mulder M. Design of a Haptic Gas Pedal for Active Car-Following Support. Intelligent Transportation Systems, IEEE Transactions on. 2011 Mar;12(1):268 –279; Available from: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/login.jsp?tp=&arnumber=5648353&url=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fstamp%2Fstamp.jsp%3Ftp%3D%26arnumber%3D5648353
Hayward J. Near misses as a measure of safety at urban intersections [Ph.D. thesis]. [University Park, PA.]: Dept. of Civil Engineering, The Pennsylvania State University; 1971.
Svensson Ã…. A method for analysing the traffic process in a safety perspective [PhD Thesis]. [Lund, Sweden]: University of Lund; 1998.
Sultan B, McDonald M. Assessing the safety benefit of automatic collision avoidance systems (During Emergency Braking Situations). Enhanced Safety of Vehicles. Nagoya, Japan; 2003; Available from: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/75672/
Horst R. Time-to-collision as a cue for decision-making in braking. VISION IN VEHICLES-III. 1991; Available from: http://trid.trb.org/view.aspx?id=347440
Allen BL, Shin BT, Cooper PJ. analysis of traffic conflicts and collisions. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board. 1978;(667):67–74; Available from: http://trid.trb.org/view.aspx?id=85806
Cooper DF, Ferguson N. Traffic studies at T-junctions, a conflict simulation record. Traffic Engineering and Control. 1976 Jul;17(7) ; Available from: http://trid.trb.org/view.aspx?id=66554
Archer J. Methods for the assessment and prediction of traffic safety at urban Intersections and their Application in Micro-simulation Modelling [PhD Thesis]. [Stockholm, Sweden]: Division of Transport and Logistics, Royal Institute of Technology, Kungliga Tekniska Högskolan; 2005.
American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO). AASHTO Green Book, Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets 2004. 5th ed. American Association of State Highway & Transportation; 2004; Available from: http://www.amazon.com/dp/1560512636
Cunto FJC, Saccomanno FF. Microlevel Traffic Simulation Method for Assessing Crash Potential at Intersections. 2007 [cited 2012 Jul 8]. Available from: http://trid.trb.org/view.aspx?id=802073
Cunto F, Saccomanno FF. Calibration and validation of simulated vehicle safety performance at signalized intersections. Accident Analysis & Prevention. 2008 May;40(3):1171–9; Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0001457508000055
Oh C, Park S, Ritchie SG. A method for identifying rear-end collision risks using inductive loop detectors. Accident Analysis & Prevention. 2006 Mar;38(2):295–301; Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0001457505001570
Annual Report on National Transportation Statistics (In Farsi). Tehran, Iran: Bureau of Information Technology, IRAN Road Maintenance & Transportation Organization, IRAN Ministry of Road and Transportation; 2011.
Azimi M, Zhang Y. Categorizing Freeway Flow Conditions by Using Clustering Methods. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board. 2010 Dec 1;2173(1):105–14; Available from: http://trb.metapress.com/content/d4402373p6x03550
SPSS Inc. The SPSS TwoStep Cluster Component: A Scalable Component Enabling More Efficient Customer Segmentation, Technical Report. Chicago, IL.; 2001; Available from: http://www.spss.ch/upload/1122644952_The%20SPSS%20TwoStep%20Cluster%20Component.pdf
Guest Editor: Eleonora Papadimitriou, PhD
Editors: Dario Babić, PhD; Marko Matulin, PhD; Marko Ševrović, PhD.
The mission of our journal is to provide high quality communication of research results, which is crucial for the effectiveness of scientific research, the promotion of scientific information, new ideas, and original research in the field of traffic and transportation engineering.
1848-4069
0353-5320
Proud publisher
Accelerating Discoveries in Traffic Science |
2024 © Promet - Traffic&Transportation journal
