Let's Connect
Follow Us
Watch Us
(+385) 1 2380 262
journal.prometfpz.unizg.hr
Promet - Traffic&Transportation journal

Accelerating Discoveries in Traffic Science

Accelerating Discoveries in Traffic Science

PUBLISHED
15.04.2022
LICENSE
Copyright (c) 2024 Dunja Radović, Mithun Mohan, Vuk Bogdanović

Comparative Analysis of Critical Headway Estimation at Urban Single-Lane Roundabouts

Authors:

Dunja Radović
University of East Sarajevo, Faculty of Transport and Traffic Engineering Doboj

Mithun Mohan
Department of Civil Engineering, National Institute of Technology Karnataka

Vuk Bogdanović
University of Novi Sad, Faculty of Technical Sciences

Keywords:critical headway, field capacity, conflicting flow rate, urban single-lane roundabouts

Abstract

According to models commonly used in practice, the capacity of roundabouts largely depends on the value of critical headway. The value of critical headway depends on the characteristics of vehicles, driving conditions, and geometric characteristics of intersections, but also on driver behaviour. Driver behaviour is the result of many factors that depend on the influence of the local environment, driver habits, mentality, etc. Accordingly, to calculate the capacity of roundabouts within the op-erational and planning analyses of roundabouts more accurately, it is necessary to use data that correspond to local conditions. In this paper, the critical headway was estimated at five urban single-lane roundabouts using five methods: Harders’, Logit, Raff’s, Wu’s, and the max-imum likelihood method. In order to determine which of the stated methods provides the most realistic estimate of critical headway, a comparison of field capacity values with theoretical capacity values was performed. Based on the comparative analysis performed in MATLAB, as well as the calculation of percentage prediction error, it was found that the Harders' method provides the most accurate estimate of critical headway at observed round-abouts in two cities in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Due to the similarity in the design of roundabouts and driver be-haviour, the results obtained in this paper can be applied in the surrounding countries, i.e., Southeast Europe

References

  1. Šarić A, Lovrić I. Multi-lane roundabout capacity evaluation. Frontiers in Built Environment. 2017;3: 42. doi: 10.3389/fbuil.2017.00042.

    Mathew S, Dhamaniya A, Arkatkar SS, Joshi G. Roundabout capacity in heterogeneous traffic condition: Modification of HCM equation and calibration. Transportation Research Procedia. 2017;27: 985-992. doi: 10.1016/j.trpro.2017.12.147.

    Kang N, Nakamura H. An analysis of heavy vehicle impact on roundabout entry capacity in Japan. Transportation Research Procedia. 2016;15: 308-318. doi: 10.1016/j.trpro.2016.06.026.

    Fang FC, Castaneda H. Computer simulation modeling of driver behavior at roundabouts. International Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems Research. 2018;16(1): 66-77. doi: 10.1007/s13177-017-0138-2.

    Rodegerdts L, et al. NCHRP Report 572 Roundabouts in the United States. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington D.C.; 2007. https://www.townofcary.org/home/showpublisheddocument?id=1765 [Accessed 12th Feb. 20

Show more
How to Cite
Radović, D. (et al.) 2022. Comparative Analysis of Critical Headway Estimation at Urban Single-Lane Roundabouts. Traffic&Transportation Journal. 34, 2 (Apr. 2022), 323-336. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7307/ptt.v34i2.3902.

SPECIAL ISSUE IS OUT

Guest Editor: Eleonora Papadimitriou, PhD

Editors: Marko Matulin, PhD, Dario Babić, PhD, Marko Ševrović, PhD


Accelerating Discoveries in Traffic Science |
2024 © Promet - Traffic&Transportation journal